Advanced searches left 3/3

Prostate Cancer - Arxiv

Summarized by Plex Scholar
Last Updated: 24 April 2022

* If you want to update the article please login/register

Using deep learning to detect patients at risk for prostate cancer despite benign biopsies

Background: The prostate biopsy, which is done by ultrasound guided systematic biopsies is a common procedure to establish a prostate cancer diagnosis. However, the 10-12 prostate core biopsies only collect a small sample of the prostate, and tumor lesions in regions between biopsy cores can be missed, contributing to a well-known low sensitivity to detect clinically relevant cancer. We developed and validated a deep convolution neural network model to distinguish between morphological features in benign prostate biopsy whole slide images from men with and without established cancer as a proof-of-principle. Methods: This report included 14,354 hematoxylin and eosin stained whole slide photographs from benign prostate biopsy samples from 1,508 men in two groups: men without an established prostate cancer diagnosis and men with at least one core biopsy diagnosed with PCa. Result: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was estimated as 0. 727 on biopsy level and 0. 738 on man level.

Source link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.14256v3


The impact of using voxel-level segmentation metrics on evaluating multifocal prostate cancer localisation

Both the Dice similarity coefficient and Hausdorff distance are both commonly used for determining medical image segmentation. This paper introduces the first version of a new asymmetric detection metric, adapting those used in object detection, for planning prostate cancer procedures. The lesion-level measurements are then compared to the voxel-level DSC and HD, while a 3D UNet is used for segmenting lesions from multiparametric MR images. Pearson's [0. 49, 0. 61] and Pearson's [0. 66, 0. 8] p-values at varying cut-offs, as a result of experimental findings, we present pairwise agreement and correlation 1 between DSC and HD, as well as 2 between voxel-level DSC and recall-controlled precision at lesion-level, as well as a pair of correlations 1 and 0. 001 at different cut-offs. We therefore caution that even with the statistical correlations, voxel-level measurements such as DSC can misrepresent lesion-level detection results for determining localization of multifocal prostate cancer and should be treated with caution.

Source link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.16415v2

* Please keep in mind that all text is summarized by machine, we do not bear any responsibility, and you should always check original source before taking any actions

* Please keep in mind that all text is summarized by machine, we do not bear any responsibility, and you should always check original source before taking any actions