* If you want to update the article please login/register
Contrasting marginal counterfactual survival curves across treatment arms is a common and popular method for inferring the causal effect of an intervention on a right-censored time-to-event event's outcome. Miao et al. 's new proximal causal inference framework extends from the standard no unmeasured confounding assumption in this paper to extend the recently published proximal causal inference framework in this paper rather than making the assumption that no one unmeasured confounding assumption was made. To get nonparametric evidence of a causal growth comparison by leveraging observed covariates as imperfect proxies of unmeasured confounders. PIPW's estimate is based on a parametric model for a so-called treatment confounding bridge function relating the treatment procedure to confounding proxies. PIPW can therefore be vulnerable to model misspecification. We perform extensive simulations to determine the finite sample results of our estimators' estimates, and new methods are applied to a study examining the effectiveness of right heart catheterization in critically ill patients in the intensive care unit.
Source link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.13144v1
This paper introduces a simple framework for causal inference using time-series cross-sectional data, in which we estimate the average treatment effect on the patients by simply stating counterfactual results for treated observations. When treatment results are heterogeneous or unobserved time-varying confounders exist, they provide more reliable causal estimates than conventional two-way fixed effects models, which are more reliable causal estimates.
Source link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.00856v2
* Please keep in mind that all text is summarized by machine, we do not bear any responsibility, and you should always check original source before taking any actions