Advanced searches left 3/3

Caudal Epidural Steroid Injection - DOAJ

Summarized by Plex Scholar
Last Updated: 12 October 2021

* If you want to update the article please login/register

Fluoroscopy-Guided Transforaminal versus Caudal Epidural Steroid Injection for Chronic Pain After Spinal Surgery: A Retrospective Mid-Term Comparative Study

Issue regularities, unfavorable occasions, treatment effects, and functional renovations for each and every treatment were contrasted at 1, 3, and 6 months following the last injection. Results: Both the Oswestry Disability Index and spoken numerical pain scale ratings shown improvement in both groups whatsoever 1, 3, and 6 months adhering to the last injection, without meaningful distinction in between teams. The quantity of time used for the injection treatment was much shorter in CA team than in TF team. Within 2 weeks of the injection treatment, the person satisfying ratings were assessed, with excellent being ranked 85. 7% amongst CA-ESI patients and 55. 7% amongst TF-ESI patients. There were no unfavorable issues after the treatment in both groups. Conclusion: The end results of FL-guided CA-ESI and TF-ESI for CPSS are similar in regards to pain reduction and useful renovations. In enhancement, compared to the TF-ESI, the client experiences much less pain during the injection, and the fulfillment with the injection treatment is verified to be better.

Source link: https://doaj.org/article/a0da90414b314bf188b0c07a98e47e19


Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Different Rates of Infusion in Caudal Epidural Steroid Injection: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Purpose To compare the clinical results in between patients with lumbosacral radiculopathy that got caudal epidural steroid injection at injection rates of 40 mL/min and 20 mL/min and to identify the issues linked with these various CESI rates. Summary of Literature CESI is extensively utilized for chronic reduced back discomfort with lumbar radiculopathy. However, the impact of CESI rates on professional results has not been well examined. One individual in the quick rate team and no patients in the sluggish rate team experienced queasiness and vomiting after injection. Eight licenses in the fast rate team and two patients in the slow-moving rate group experienced discomfort at the injection site. Verdicts Although there were no substantial distinctions in between injection rates in the short-term professional renovation results, the fast injection rate group experienced even more discomfort at the injection site, recommending that using the slow-moving injection rate might be taken into consideration.

Source link: https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2019.0380


Caudal epidural steroid injection ultrasound-guided versus fluoroscopy-guided in treatment of refractory lumbar disc prolapse with radiculopathy

Team 1 had substantially boosted the straight leg elevating and modified Schober tests, VAS, and ODI at 3-month and 1-month post-injection examination in comparison to baseline recordings; Group 2 had significantly improved the straight leg elevating and customized Schober examinations, VAS, and ODI at 1-month and 3-month post-injection examination in comparison to baseline recordings; and US-guided CESI was not statistically different from the FL-guided CESI in the improvement of the straight leg raising and changed Schober examinations in addition to VAS and ODI at 1-month and 3-month post-injection examination. Verdict US is exceptional in leading CESI with similar treatment outcomes as compared with FL-guided CESI.

Source link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43055-020-00388-8


Effect of supraneural transforaminal epidural steroid injection combined with caudal epidural steroid injection with catheter in chronic radicular pain management: Double blinded randomized controlled trial. [version 1; peer review: 3 approved, 1 approved with reservations]

History: Epidural steroid injection has been utilized in managing chronic radicular discomfort. Relating to various methods of ESI, the synergistic effect of caudal ESI on transforaminal ESI in persistent lumbosacral radicular discomfort in prospective randomized regulated trial has not been determined. Techniques: A total amount of 54 qualified patients with lumbosacral radicular discomfort were randomly designated to go through TFESI plus CESI or TFESI alone. The efficient response to treatment was predefined by at the very least a 50% decreased spoken numerical rating scale from standard between team comparison and the functional outcomes as gauged by improved Oswestry Disability Index by least 15 points from standard. Nonetheless, the TC group revealed substantial pain alleviation compared to the T group in spondylolisthesis and failed back surgery syndrome at 1 month. Conclusions: A treatment combining TFESI and CESI revealed substantial discomfort alleviation over TFESI alone in spondylolithesis and fell short back surgical procedure disorder at 1 month.

Source link: https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.23188.1


Effect of supraneural transforaminal epidural steroid injection combined with caudal epidural steroid injection with catheter in chronic radicular pain management: Double blinded randomized controlled trial. [version 2; peer review: 3 approved, 1 approved with reservations]

Background: Epidural steroid injection has been made use of in managing chronic radicular pain. Concerning different techniques of ESI, the collaborating result of caudal ESI on transforaminal ESI in chronic lumbosacral radicular pain in possible randomized regulated test has not been determined. Methods: A total of 54 qualified patients with lumbosacral radicular pain were randomly designated to undergo TFESI plus CESI or TFESI alone. The reliable response to treatment was predefined by a minimum of a 30% decreased verbal numerical score range from baseline in between team comparison and the functional outcomes as measured by enhanced Oswestry Disability Index by the very least 15 points from standard. No statistical difference was observed between below team analysis in discomfort relief and insignificant distinction between team contrasts of practical outcomes. Conclusions: A treatment incorporating TFESI and CESI revealed substantial pain alleviation over TFESI alone at 3 months.

Source link: https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.23188.2


Caudal Epidural Steroid Injection under Fluoroscopy in Management of Chronic Low Back Pain with or without Radiculopathy

Background: Low neck and back pain with or without radiculopathy is most common presentations of persistent pain. These patients were given caudal epidural steroid shots under fluoroscopy guidance with 60 mg depo-methylprednisolone included to 0. 5% lignocaine making a quantity of 10 ml. All these patients were asked to comply with up at discomfort center at 1 month, 3 months & 6 months to evaluate the visual analogue scale rating, Oswestry handicap index, Straight leg Raise test & Patient contentment range. Results: There was substantial reduction in VAS rating in one month, three months and six months follow up after caudal epidural steroid injection. The 50% decrease in discomfort was seen in 72 patients, 69 patients and 62 patients in one month, three months and six months specifically. Verdict: Caudal epidural steroid injections creates considerable relief suffering signs of backache with or without radiculopathy and raises the high quality of life.

Source link: https://doi.org/10.3126/jonmc.v9i1.29382


A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial to Determine the Effectiveness of Caudal Epidural Steroid Injection in Lumbosacral Sciatica

Introduction: Caudal epidural steroid injection have been a \ r \ npart of nonsurgical administration of lumbosacral sciatic nerve pain since \ r \ nlast 50 years however numerous randomized regulated tests stop working to \ r \ nprovide persuading proof in favour of its efficiency. Purpose: To examine the efficacy of caudal epidural steroid injection \ r \ nin patients of lumbosacral sciatic nerve pain in comparison to sugar pill. Materials and Methods: The research included patients of \ r \ nsciatica triggered by lumbosacral disc prolapse. Caudal epidural \ r \ ninjections of 80 mg methyl prednisolone were infused in 47 \ r \ npatients in one team. At the end of the research study there was no \ r \ nsignificant difference in key result in between the teams: \ r \ n22/46 patients in the placebo group and 28/47 \ r \ nin the steroid team were taken into consideration as success \ r \ n. Conclusion: Caudal epidural steroid shots offer no \ r \ nadditional improvement over sugar pill in the lengthy term all-natural \ r \ nhistory of lumbosacral sciatic nerve pain.

Source link: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2017/21905.9392


Ultrasound versus fluoroscopy-guided caudal epidural steroid injection for the treatment of chronic low back pain with radiculopathy: A randomised, controlled clinical trial

Background and Aims: Caudal epidural steroid administration is an effective treatment for persistent reduced back pain. Ultrasound assistance is recently being made use of hurting clinic procedures. We compared the fluoroscopy advice and ultrasound advice for caudal epidural steroid injection with regard to the time required for proper positioning of the needle and scientific effectiveness in patients with chronic LBP. Techniques: Fifty patients with chronic LBP with radiculopathy, not reacting to traditional medical administration, were randomly designated to get injection depot methyl prednisolone through caudal path either using ultrasound guidance or fluoroscopy guidance. All patients were adhered to up for following 2 months to examine Visual Analogue Scale rating and ODI at the 2nd week and again at the end of 2nd and 1st month. Conclusion: Ultrasound guidance can be a risk-free alternate tool for attaining quicker needle placement in caudal epidural space.

Source link: https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.183391

* Please keep in mind that all text is summarized by machine, we do not bear any responsibility, and you should always check original source before taking any actions

* Please keep in mind that all text is summarized by machine, we do not bear any responsibility, and you should always check original source before taking any actions