Advanced searches left 3/3

Carbon Dioxide - Arxiv

Summarized by Plex Scholar
Last Updated: 10 January 2023

* If you want to update the article please login/register

Molecular dynamics predictions of transport properties for carbon dioxide hydrates under pre-nucleation conditions using TIP4P/Ice water and EPM2, TraPPE, and Zhang carbon dioxide potentials

Carbon capture and sequestration are two examples of recent technologies that exploit gas hydrates phenomena. Accurate numerical simulations for the viscosity of carbon dioxide hydrate systems under pre-nucleation conditions can be useful for process development and monitoring of such devices. Methods: This work validates the viscosity simulations of molecular dynamics simulations based on previously collected experimental results. The TIP4P/Ice force field was used to model water, but the EPM2, TraPPE, and Zhang force fields were used for carbon dioxide. Conclusions: The EPM2 force field more accurately predicted the viscosity of carbon dioxide hydrates systems at pre-nucleation temperatures relative to TraPPE and Zhang.

Source link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.01757v1


Dynamic Viscosity of Methane and Carbon Dioxide Hydrate Systems from Pure Water at High-Pressure Driving Forces

In the majority of the experimental pressure range, the effect of temperature on the viscosity was one order of magnitude larger than the pressure effect on viscosity. Due to carbon dioxide's higher solubility in water, the pressure effect on the viscosity of carbon dioxide systems in which no hydrate growth was observed was up to one order of magnitude higher than that of the methane systems.

Source link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.01756v1


Optimal pricing for carbon dioxide removal under inter-regional leakage

Although no global carbon price exists, we derive second-best policy guidelines for CDR subsidies and carbon taxes when no global carbon price exists, but a national government implements a unilateral climate policy. Because of carbon leakage and a balance of resource trade versus an optimal CDR subsidy, we find that the optimal carbon tax differs from an optimal CDR subsidy. Because of lower supply-side leakage in fossil resource markets, optimal removal subsidy tends to be larger than the carbon tax for the first time. Because marginal environmental harms are negligible, to a significant producer shortage from carbon exporters, third, net carbon importers may set their removal subsidy even below their carbon tax.

Source link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.09299v1

* Please keep in mind that all text is summarized by machine, we do not bear any responsibility, and you should always check original source before taking any actions

* Please keep in mind that all text is summarized by machine, we do not bear any responsibility, and you should always check original source before taking any actions